I believe both programs can be downloaded as demos and that would be the best test for your needs. If you go that route I strongly recommend spending some quality time with tutorials on the LR catalog system.I initially made a huge mess. I used to do that once in a while but I've quit using DXO after their last release. You can even route raw files from LR to DXO. LR and PS also have the advantage of being able to run a huge range of software running as plugins. The spot healing tool in PS does the best job of any of these kinds of tools I've tried. Even if you don't use PS much it has a few tools that are pretty much the best I've seen.

One of them is the Automatic Repair tool, which copies the Spot Removal tool. But compared to DXO it feels like a sports car on my machine. It also comes with some special features like Lightroom.

It's often said the LR is a resource hog. DXO can also take a very long time to support new cameras and lenses, though if you shoot Canon, Nikon, or Sony you're probably in better shape.

Just moving basic adjustment sliders It's slow refreshing the image. DxO PhotoLab offers two one-time payment plans: Essential for 129 and Elite for 199. It doesn't have a dam, it doesn't have layers, and it feels very slow on my machine. Lightroom and DxO PhotoLab are similar in many ways, so we look at both programs in this Lightroom review. Using 2012 Mac mini (albeit one of the quad core i7 2.6ghz versions with 16gb ram) I really have two major advantages for DXO: IMO, their Prime noise reduction and lens corrections modules are really excellent.

Dxo photolab vs lightroom